24 January 2006

Why Doesn't the Media Have the Balls…

…to say it like it is: Our boy here hijacked thousands of Intel- and Intel-derived-processor-based personal computers running various versions of the Windows operating system and used them to send out spam??

American owns up to hijacking PCs:
“Hundreds of thousands of computers were infected

“A 20-year-old American has admitted hijacking thousands of computers and using them to send out spam.

“Jeanson James Ancheta pleaded guilty in a Los Angeles court to charges of conspiring to violate anti-spam and computer misuse laws, and fraud.

“Prosecutors said the case was the first to target so-called botnets.

“These are networks of computers that are infected with malicious software and then used to send spam and attack websites.

“‘Mr Ancheta was responsible for a particularly insidious string of crimes,’ said a spokesman for the US attorney’s office in Los Angeles, Thom Mrozek.

“‘He hijacked somewhere in the area of half a million computer systems. This not only affected computers like the one in your home, but it allowed him and others to orchestrate large-scale attacks.’…”

16 January 2006

I’m a Heretic! And What a Heretic to Be!!

You scored as Pelagianism. You are a Pelagian. You reject ideas about man's fallen human nature and believe that as a result we are able to fully obey God. You are the first Briton to contribute significantly to Christian thought, but you're still excommunicated in 417.

Pelagianism

92%

Chalcedon compliant

67%

Monophysitism

33%

Docetism

0%

Arianism

0%

Apollanarian

0%

Adoptionist

0%

Donatism

0%

Gnosticism

0%

Monarchianism

0%

Nestorianism

0%

Albigensianism

0%

Modalism

0%

Socinianism

0%

Are you a heretic?
created with QuizFarm.com


----------------
Listening to: The San Gabriel Valley Choral Company - Shenandoah
via FoxyTunes

And He’s a Hypocrite, Besides

From the Washington Post Web site this morning:
Calif. Inmate, 76, Faces Execution Tonight

“By DAVID KRAVETS
“The Associated Press
“Monday, January 16, 2006; 2:23 PM

“SAN FRANCISCO -- A 76-year-old convicted killer - legally blind, nearly deaf and in a wheelchair - tried to stave off execution early Tuesday by arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court that it would be cruel and unusual punishment to put a feeble old man to death.

“Clarence Ray Allen, whose birthday was Monday, was set to die by lethal injection just after midnight. He stood to become the oldest person executed in California - and the second-oldest put to death nationally - since the Supreme Court allowed capital punishment to resume in 1976.

“Allen raised two claims never before endorsed by the high court: that executing a frail old man would violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment, and that the 23 years he spent on death row were unconstitutionally cruel as well.

“He was condemned in 1982 for ordering a hit from prison that left three people dead.…”

He was in prison in the first place for having had his son’s girlfriend murdered, just in case she might tell police about a grocery store robbery.

“…The Supreme Court has never set an upper age limit for executions or created an exception for physical illness. But some justices have expressed interest in deciding whether a long stay on death row is indeed unconstitutionally cruel.

“In 20002, Justice Stephen Breyer said in the case of a Florida inmate who spent 27 years in prison: ‘It is fairly asked whether such punishment is both unusual and cruel.’

“Justice Clarence Thomas disagreed, writing that the inmate ‘could long ago have ended his anxieties and uncertainties by submitting to what the people of Florida have deemed him to deserve: execution.…’”

How is execution more cruel and unusual for an old man than for a younger person? And this piece of logic coming from someone whose extended stay on death row was certainly, as is the case in most death row residents, due to his, and his lawyers’, own efforts to obtain just that result.

You can’t have it both ways, Clarence Ray; it’s time to reap the benefits of all of your past efforts. You did ask for it, after all.